Initial Results of Laser Ureteroscopy Treatment for Lithiasis of the Upper Urinary Tract at Aristide Le Dantec Hospital in Dakar (Senegal)

Main Article Content

Oumar Gaye
Ngor Mack Thiam
Youssef Bellamine
Modou Ndiaye
Boubacar Fall
Yaya Sow
Abdoulaye Ndiath
Ousmane Sow
Aboubacar Traore
Samba Thiapato Faye
Ndiaga Seck Ndour
Malick Diaw
Babacar Sine
Alioune Sarr
Amath Thiam
Cyrille Ze Ondo
Babacar Diao
Alain Khassim Ndoye

Abstract

Background: In Africa, lithogenesis was initially considered rare and it was mostly caused by infections. Recent studies suggest that obesity, change in dietary habits (milk, dairy products) and hot climate can contribute to an increase of the condition in the region. Over the past decades, the management of upper urinary tract urolithiasis has evolved significantly with minimally invasive techniques. The challenge for sub-Saharan countries is related with the acquisition and the training for minimally invasive treatment. In fact, open surgery has less indications in the management of urolithiasis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the preliminary results of ureteroscopic laser treatment for upper urinary tract lithiasis in our hospital.


Methods: This was a prospective, descriptive study realized between June 2016 and December 2018. The patients included were those who had ureteroscopic laser treatment for upper urinary tract lithiasis. The treatment was performed under general anesthesia by two surgeons. The studied parameters were: age, sex, patient medical history, comorbidities, renal function, cytobacteriological examination of urine, characteristics of lithiasis, intra and postoperative complications (using the Clavien–Dindo classification), ureteroscopic laser failures (frequency and causes). Success of treatment was defined by: the absence of a residual fragment at the renal and ureteral level or of a residual fragment <4 mm at the renal level on the control imaging. Data analysis was done with IBM SPSS Statistic 23 software. Statistical significance was considered when P < 0.05.


Results: This study involved 43 patients. The mean age was 40.84 years ± 15.33 years. The age group between 30 and 39 years was predominant. The sex ratio was 1.26. Nephritic colic was the circumstance of discovery in 93.02%. The Uro-CT scan performed in all our patients, revealed kidney stones in 16.3% and ureteral stones in 83.7%. The right side was the most involved in 55.8%. The mean size of the stones was 12.2 mm ± 4.89 at the renal level and 12.05 mm ± 5.54 at the ureteral level. The semi-rigid ureteroscope was used in 88.37% and the flexible ureteroscope in 11.63%. The lithiasis was visualized in 74.4% of cases. Laser fragmentation was performed in 69.77% of cases. A J stent was placed after 72.1% of cases. Pelvic ureteral stripping and pelvic ureteral aspiration were realized in one case each. Acute pyelonephritis (ANP) was observed in 25.6% of patients. There were 75% fragment free at postoperative control. Any factors associated with treatment failure were not found.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gaye, O., Thiam, N. M., Bellamine, Y., Ndiaye, M., Fall, B., Sow, Y., Ndiath, A., Sow, O., Traore, A., Faye, S. T., Ndour, N. S., Diaw, M., Sine, B., Sarr, A., Thiam, A., Ze Ondo, C., Diao, B., & Ndoye, A. K. (2021). Initial Results of Laser Ureteroscopy Treatment for Lithiasis of the Upper Urinary Tract at Aristide Le Dantec Hospital in Dakar (Senegal). Journal of Endoluminal Endourology, 4(2), e13-e19. https://doi.org/10.22374/jeleu.v4i2.118
Section
Original Article
Author Biography

Oumar Gaye, Urology-Andrology Department, Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec

Urology-Andrology Department, Hôpital Aristide Le Dantec

References

1. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052
2. Pinduli I, Spivacow R, Del Valle E, Vidal S, Negri AL, Previgliano H, et al. Prevalence of urolithiasis in the autonomous city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Urol Res. 2006;34:8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0003-7
3. Rizvi SA, Naqvi SA, Hussain Z, Hashmi A, Hus-sain M, Zafar MN, et al. The management of stone disease. BJU Int. 2002;89:62–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1465-5101.2001.134.x
4. Hounnasso PP, Avakoudjo JD, Paré AK, Brahima K, Ouattara A, Agounkpé MM, et al. Symptomatic urinary lithiasis: Epidemiology and management at urology department of university hospital of cotonou. Open J Urol. 2015;5(2):7–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oju.2015.52002
5. Rimtebaye K, Sillong FD, Tashkand AZ, Kaboro M, Niang L, Gueye SM. Urolithiasis: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in urology department of n’djamena in chad. Open J Urol. 2015;5(11):199–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oju.2015.511032
6. Wathigo FK, Hayombe A, Maina D. Urolithiasis analysis in a multiethnic population at a tertiary hospital in Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(158):1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2474-3
7. Bouatia M, Benramdane L, Idrissi MO, Draoui M. An epidemiological study on the composition of urinary stones in Morocco in relation to age and sex. Afr J Urol. 2015;21(3):194–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. afju.2015.02.006
8. Zumstein V, Betschart P, Abt D, Schmid HP, Panje CM, Putora PM. Surgical management of urolithiasis—A systematic analysis of available guidelines. BMC Urol. 2018;18(25):1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0332-9
9. Diallo Y, Kouka SC, Kane R, et al. Lithiase du haut appareil urinaire: Aspects épidémiologiques, cliniques et thérapeutiques dans la région de Thiès, Sénégal. Rev Méd Madag. 2015;5(1):520–5.
10. Kambou T, Traore AC, Zango B, Bonkoungou B, Ouattara T, Sanou A. Lithiase du haut appareil urinaire au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sanou Souro de Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso): Aspects épidémiologiques, cliniques et thérapeutiques: A propos de 110. Afr J Urol. 2005;11(1):55–60.
11. Fall B, Mouracade P, Bergerat S, Saussine C. L’urétéroscopie souple-laser dans le traitement des calculs du rein et de l’uretère: indications, morbidité et résultats. Prog Urol. 2014 Oct;24(12): 771–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2014.06.007
12. Padja E, Ibarra VA, Lmezguidi K, Janane A, Ghadouane M, Ameur A, et al. Urétéroscopie souple laser dans le traitement des calculs du haut appareil urinaire: résultats à propos de 166 interventions. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22:13. http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/ pamj.2015.22.13.7591
13. Conort P, Doré B, Saussine C. Prise en charge urologique des calculs rénaux et urétéraux de l’adulte. Prog Urol. 2004;14:1096–102.
14. Knopf HJ, Graff HJ, Schulze H. Perioperative antibi-otic prophylaxis in ureteroscopic stone removal. Eur Urol. 2003;44:115–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00189-1
15. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society guideline, part I. J Urol. 2016;196:1153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
16. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society guideline, part II. J Urol. 2016;196:1161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. juro.2016.05.091
17. T€urk C, Petrık A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69:475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
18. Lechevallier E, Saussine C, Traxer O. Urétéroscopie pour calcul du haut appareil urinaire. Prog Urol. 2008 Dec;18(12):912–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. purol.2008.09.022
19. Park HK, Paick SH, Oh SJ, Kim HH. Ureteroscopic lithotripsy under local anesthesia: Analysis of the effectiveness and patient tolerability. Eur Urol. 2004;45:670–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2004.01.003
20. Niang L, Pare AK, Ndoye M, Samassékou A, Avakoudjo DJG, Agounkpé MM, et al. Urétéroscopie rétrograde: Expérience de l’hôpital général de Grand-Yoff. Afr J Urol. 2016;22(2):110–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2016.01.002
21. Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Albanis S, Serafetinides E, Varkarakis J, Protogerou V. Management and follow-up of impacted ureteral stones. Urol Int. 2003;70:269–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000070133
22. Wakrim B. Place de l’urétéroscopie dans la prise de la charge de la lithiase urétérale. Marrakech; 2008. 23. Djaladat H, Tajik P, Payandemehr P, Alehashemi
S. Ureteral catheterization in uncomplicated ureterolithotripsy: A randomized, controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2007;52:836–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.042
24. Alapont JM, Broseta E, Oliver F, Pontones JL, Boronat F, Jiménez-Cruz JF. Ureteral avulsion as a complica-tion of ureteroscopy. Int Braz J Urol. 2003;29:18–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382003000100004
25. Jungers P, Joly D, Blanchard A, et al. Lithiases rénales héréditaires monogéniques: récents acquis diagnostiques et thérapeutiques. Néphrol Thér. 2008;4:231–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2007.12.005
26. Ibrahim AK. Reporting ureteroscopy complications using the modified clavien classification system. J Urol Ann. 2015 Jan–Mar;7(1):53–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.148611
27. Moyano Calvo JL, Huesa Martinez I, Ramirez Men-doza A, Di¡valos Casanova G, Aparcero Rodriguez E, Morales Lopez A, et al. Ambulatory ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy. Our experience after 1803 ureteral stones. Arch Esp Urol. 2004;57:539–44.
28. Ben Saddik MA, Al-Qahtani Sejiny S, Ndoye M, Gil-diez-deMedina S, Merlet B, Thomas A, et al. Urétéroscopie souple dans le traitement des calculs du rein de 2 à 3 cm. Prog Urol. 2011;21:327–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2010.07.012